Dr Andrew Kaufman explains
It is my opinion that just as Kary Mullis stated that no retrovirus is proven to have ever harmed anyone, Kaufman (knowing this) decided to take it one step further and say "No virus is proven to have ever harmed anyone either, or causes illness.". In my opinion, this one exaggeration undermines all his good work in other areas at exposing errors in the official Covid-19 death and infection rates, that are being used to starve to death millions of women and children in the Third World. When scientist eventually bust his theory in public and he has no answers it will be an embarrassment to all of us trying to expose the illogic and evils of lockdowns, and the false nature of Covid-19 stats. It is sad. Kaufman is good at presentation, good at the process of teaching, has the guts to contradict the official line, has done a lot of good exposing falsity, but has this one giant fault waiting to collapse underneath him.
I have read that Kaufman does not only deny a virus causes and infectious disease, but that there are no infectious diseases at all, not even bacterial. If so he is open to even bigger defeats. I have not been able to resolve if he goes that far yet. Where do semantics come into this? If you eat a lot of bacteria in bad food you get food poisoning. Right? So is he saying if only a little of that bacterium goes into your body only the already sick will get food poisoning? Is he denying that waterborne pathogens, and even amoebas, cause disease? Or does he say food poisoning and cryptosporidium poisoning are an illness but not an infectious disease?
The very fact that our immune system goes into overdrive to fight viruses is a good indication it has detected they do harm. Our body does not go into overdrive to destroy the commensal bacteria in our bodies. No doubt Dr Kaufman will say the human body simply wants to turf out invaders of any kind, good, bad or indifferent. It does not sound very harmless that a virus invades cells and hijacks them for replication.
More and more Kaufman's way of presenting his case tends toward "No virus is proven to cause disease" as if he intends jumping ship and saying "I believe viruses do cause disease we just cannot prove it like with bacteria as a virus is too small to get to grips with to physically analyse it". If so that reminds me of how the TV News was saying at first the first stats 1-3 million stats showed infections and deaths FROM Covid-19, then started instead presenting it as deaths WITH Covid-19. The changing of the word "from" to "with" was a supermassive u-turn many members of the public never noticed, and was maybe the biggest proof ever the stats were all bogus. However I doubt Kaufman will do that. I think he will keep on saying a virus never causes a disease. He needs to get saved by Jesus and make a restart, dump his errors and keep his excellent analysis of the faults of the Covid-19 statistics. That way he will do much more good.
"What PCR does is to select a genetic sequence and then amplify it enormously. It can accomplish the equivalent of finding a needle in a haystack. It can amplify that needle into a haystack. Like an electronically amplified antenna PCR greatly amplifies the signal, but it also greatly amplifies the noise. Since the amplification is exponential, the slightest error in measurement. the slightest contamination, can result in errors of many orders of magnitude."
The number of cycles of amplification reaches a recommended maximum at 45, as otherwise you amplify the "noise". The present PCR Test pushes the amplification to its absolute recommended limit, so this especially means it is not a very accurate test.
that DNR orders forced on the elderly were not here last year, kind of massively explains some of the deaths, but the elderly have had their arms put up their backs by the UK Government to sign forms that they are considered DNR (Do not resuscitate) in the event of respiratory illness (almost always reclassified as Covid-19).
IS HE RIGHT ON EVERYTHING?
The claim is twofold that KAUFMAN IS WRONG: (not saying here where I personally think he is right and wrong, just linking to the criticisms of him fr your research)
1) There is a virus as its entire Genome is mapped. The Link Flora Teoh gives is... https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7 and so they say its proof it exists.
2) Kevin W. McCairn Ph.D. Claims River's Postulates were fulfilled in the Zhu Paper from China. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X86-aFK6sPs&feature=youtu.be My angle on that is the Paper from China cannot be treated as science unless repeated in the West.
Flora Teoh is being used by Facebook as the scientific refutation of the Manufactured Pandemic article ( https://www.globalresearch.ca/manufactured-pandemic-testing-people-any-strain-coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781 ), people are threatened on Facebook if they try to post the link.